II Ka 66/18
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against speeding conviction, upholding evidence evaluation and penalty proportionality.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against a conviction for excessive speeding in a built-up area. The defense argued that the speed measurement device was illegal and that the speed limit was exceeded by 47 km/h, but the court found these claims to be unsupported by evidence. The court upheld the first-instance verdict, stating that the evidence was evaluated correctly and the imposed fine was proportionate to the severity of the traffic violation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o miarach karnych i karnych; ustawa o postępowaniu w sprawach karnych: Sąd może odrzucić dowody sprzeczne z innymi wiarygodnymi zeznaniemmi, a wyrok jest prawomocny, jeśli kara jest proporcjonalna do naruszenia porządku w ruchu drogowym.
Keywords
AI generated
excessive speeding
built-up area
speed measurement device
proportionality of penalty
free evaluation of evidence
traffic safety
appeal dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 92a k.w.
art. 118 k.p.w.
art. 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 29a ustawy o miarach
art. 7 k.p.k.
art. 8 k.p.w.
art. 33 k.w.
art. 24 k.w.
art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 119 k.p.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 10/17
Court dismissed appeal against traffic fine, upholding speed violation conviction based on witness testimony.
VI Ka 472/17
Court reduced fine and speed limit breach finding by applying benefit of the doubt to expert measurement errors.
II Ka 49/15
Court dismisses speeding appeal due to statute of limitations expiring two years after the offense.
IV Ka 18/16
Court dismissed appeal against speeding conviction, upholding evidence evaluation and factual findings despite procedural complaints.
VI Ka 547/14
Court reversed traffic speed fine due to uncorrected laser device measurement error in favor of defendant.