XII C 1195/13
AI generated
Civil court awards noise pollution damages and acoustic renovation costs to property owners against airport operator.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe civil court ordered the airport operator to pay property owners 114,184.37 PLN for noise-related damages and necessary acoustic renovations. Plaintiffs argued that airport noise and restricted usage zones devalued their property and forced costly soundproofing measures. The court accepted expert testimony confirming noise violations and approved the renovation costs calculated by a construction expert.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 455 k.c.; Art. 481 § 1, 2 k.c.; Art. 98 kpc; Art. 108 § 1 kpc: The court established that property owners are entitled to compensation for noise-induced property devaluation and the costs of necessary acoustic adaptations when statutory noise limits are exceeded.
Keywords
AI generated
noise pollution damages
property devaluation
acoustic renovation costs
airport liability
statutory interest
expert valuation
civil compensation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 455 k.c.
Art. 481 § 1 k.c.
Art. 481 § 2 k.c.
Art. 98 kpc
Art. 108 § 1 kpc
art. 244 § 1 k.p.c
art. 245 k.p.c
art. 455 k.c
art. 481 § 1 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedI ACa 1264/17
Court dismisses appeal regarding delayed compensation interest, ruling it accrues from claim filing date.
I ACa 1201/17
Appellate court adjusts interest start dates for partial property damage award based on procedural timeline.
I ACa 1084/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld interest calculation from expert report date under Civil Code provisions.
I ACa 358/18
Court shifts interest start date to claim filing date, rejecting defendant's argument for later notice.
XII C 61/20
Court partially allowed noise damage claim against airport company for 91% of plaintiff's 2012 demand.