Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IV Ka 1166/13 AI generated

Appeal court quashes first-instance verdict for violating the prohibition of aggravation in retrial proceedings.

Case Number IV Ka 1166/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court quashed the first-instance judgment against defendants S. H. and D. B. due to a procedural violation of the prohibition against aggravation. The lower court had previously acquitted the defendants of the specific acts charged, but the retrial imposed a heavier penalty and expanded the factual findings to include new conduct. The court ruled that this constituted a 'grossly unfair' decision under the relevant statute, necessitating the case's return to the lower court for a new trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 109 § 2 k.p.s.w. w zw. z art. 443 k.p.k.; The prohibition of aggravation (reformationis in peius) in misdemeanor proceedings prevents a retrial court from issuing a heavier sentence or less favorable legal characterization than the previous judgment, rendering such a verdict grossly unfair.

Keywords

AI generated
prohibition of aggravation reformationis in peius misdemeanor proceedings grossly unfair verdict procedural violation retrial proceedings heavier penalty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.s.w.
Art. 443 k.p.k.
Art. 435 k.p.k.
Art. 440 k.p.k.
art. 109 § 2 k.p
art. 435 k.p.k
art. 440 k.p.k
art. 443 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II KK 33/06
II KK 399/03

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text