II W 899/17
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of negligence in dog keeping causing livestock damage and sentenced to fine.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of two offenses under Article 77 of the Penal Code for failing to exercise due care while keeping dogs, resulting in significant damage to neighbors' poultry and rabbits. The prosecution argued that the defendant's dogs frequently ran loose despite prior incidents, while the defense offered no effective rebuttal to the evidence of unsecured kennels. Consequently, the court imposed a combined fine of 250 zloty, citing the defendant's repeated negligence and lack of justification for the animals' behavior.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 77 k.k.; Art. 9 § 2 k.k.: The owner of an animal is liable for damages caused by the animal if they fail to exercise due care in keeping it, punishable by a fine or admonition.
Keywords
AI generated
negligence in animal keeping
liability for animal damage
failure to secure kennel
penal code article 77
fine for livestock damage
dog control obligations
civil compensation in criminal proceedings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 77 k.k.
Art. 9 § 2 k.k.
Art. 24 § 1 and 3 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 616 § 1 and 2 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 of the Act of June 23, 1973 on fines in criminal proceedings
§ 1 pkt 1 of the Minister of Justice Regulation of October 10, 2001
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX W 522/15
Sąd Rejonowy w Olsztynie wyrokiem z dnia 10 marca 2015r.został skazany za to , że w dniu 25 stycznia 2015 roku około godz.
II W 280/18
Court convicted defendant of dog control offense under old law, imposing fine due to negligence.
II W 56/18
Court convicted dog owner of misdemeanor for failing to secure yard, causing seven deer deaths.
II W 433/18
Court finds defendant guilty of negligence with sheep damaging neighbor's trees and imposes a 200 PLN fine.