II W 177/16
AI generated
Court convicted driver of speeding, rejecting defense's expert opinion request due to minor measurement error.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of speeding and imposed a 300 PLN fine along with court costs. The defense argued for a new expert opinion regarding the laser speed measurement, claiming the beam was misdirected at the windshield rather than the license plate. The court rejected this request because the error was minor and did not affect the accuracy of the reading, finding no other procedural flaws to warrant a retrial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a kw; Art. 33 kw: The court may convict for speeding based on laser measurements where minor technical errors, such as beam misdirection, do not compromise the result's reliability or justify a new expert opinion.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
laser speed measurement
expert opinion request
beam misdirection error
fine imposition
procedural dismissal
traffic safety
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 92a kw
art. 33 kw
art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.
art. 118 § 1 pkt. 1 k.p.w.
§ 2 i 3 pk. 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22.12.2017 roku
art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 21 pkt.2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Related Decisions
AI generatedXII W 3783/15
Court convicts driver for speeding in built-up area, rejecting defense's clock discrepancy claim.
IX W 3471/15
Court convicts driver of speeding violation based on valid laser speed measurement and lack of mitigating circumstances.
II W 1016/17
Court convicts driver of speeding over 50 km/h and imposes 500 PLN fine plus court costs.
II W 348/20
Court convicted driver of speeding violation based on radar evidence despite defendant's denial of facts.
II W 190/17
Court convicted driver of speeding and lack of documents, imposing a fine for traffic violations.