XII C 189/14
AI generated
Court partially allowed noise damage claim for acoustic renovation costs and statutory interest against airport operator.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court ordered the defendant to pay 39,906.39 PLN for necessary acoustic renovation costs plus statutory interest, while dismissing the remaining interest claim. Plaintiffs argued that airport noise and restricted usage zones caused property value loss, but the defendant contested the damage. The court accepted the expert valuation of renovation costs and applied statutory interest rules, noting plaintiffs partially lost on interest grounds.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 455 k.c.; Art. 481 § 1, 2 k.c.; Art. 98 kpc; Art. 108 § 1 kpc: The court supports claims for necessary remediation costs due to environmental damage and awards statutory interest upon default, while dismissing unsupported interest claims.
Keywords
AI generated
acoustic renovation costs
airport noise damage
statutory interest claims
property value reduction
civil compensation award
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 455 k.c.
Art. 481 § 1 k.c.
Art. 481 § 2 k.c.
Art. 98 kpc
Art. 108 § 1 kpc
art. 244 § 1 k.p.c
art. 245 k.p.c
art. 455 k.c
art. 481 § 1 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedI ACa 1264/17
Court dismisses appeal regarding delayed compensation interest, ruling it accrues from claim filing date.
I ACa 1201/17
Appellate court adjusts interest start dates for partial property damage award based on procedural timeline.
I ACa 494/19
Appellate court reduced damages for property devaluation due to airport noise zone, citing lack of precise initial loss assessment.
I ACa 358/18
Court shifts interest start date to claim filing date, rejecting defendant's argument for later notice.
XII C 1109/14
Court partially allowed environmental damage claim for property value loss due to airport noise zone creation.