IX Ka 1674/13
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal against drunk cycling conviction, upholding manual breath test validity and judge authority.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal regarding a conviction for drunk cycling based on a manual breathalyzer test. The defense argued the test was improperly conducted and questioned the authority of the judge who issued the ruling. The court rejected these claims, affirming the procedural correctness of the manual test and the validity of the judge's decision despite recent Supreme Court rulings on judicial transfers.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 87 § 2 k.w.; Art. 118 § 1 k.p.w.; The court upheld the validity of a manual breathalyzer test and confirmed the jurisdiction of a judge whose transfer was authorized by a state secretary prior to a Supreme Court ruling invalidating such authorizations.
Keywords
AI generated
drunk cycling conviction
manual breathalyzer test
judicial authority transfer
appellate dismissal
procedural correctness
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 87 § 2 k.w.
Art. 118 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 456 k.p.k.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 75 § 3 Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 75 § 2 pkt 1 Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
art. 118 § 1 k.p
art. 627 k.p.k