Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I C 1700/17 AI generated

Court dismissed claim for debt repayment due to statute of limitations and plaintiff's failure to prove validity.

Case Number I C 1700/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for debt repayment, ruling that the statute of limitations had expired and the plaintiff failed to prove the debt's validity. Although the defendant raised the limitation defense, the plaintiff did not respond to the court's summons or present evidence regarding when the claim became due. Consequently, the court accepted the defendant's argument that the claim was time-barred and ordered the plaintiff to bear the litigation costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 118 k.c.; Art. 6 k.c.; Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 230 k.p.c.; Art. 203 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 203 § 4 k.p.c.; Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c. - A claim is barred by the statute of limitations if the creditor fails to prove the date the claim became due, and the defendant's silence on the limitation defense is interpreted as an admission of its validity when the creditor remains passive.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations burden of proof debt repayment civil procedure time-barred claim litigation costs failure to appear

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 6 k.c.
Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 230 k.p.c.
Art. 203 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 203 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 107 zd. 3 k.p.c.
Art. 62 § 2 k.p.c.
§ 2 pkt 6 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015r.
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text