Court acquits one defendant of theft but convicts him of theft and criminal damage with combined sentence.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court acquitted defendant M.L. of the charge of theft regarding the first incident but convicted him of theft and criminal damage for the second and third incidents. While the prosecution argued for guilt on all counts, the court found insufficient evidence for the initial theft charge but established facts for the boat misuse and shop burglary. Consequently, the court imposed a combined prison sentence and ordered restitution for the proven damages.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 279 § 1 kk; Art. 289 § 2 kk; Art. 288 § 1 kk; Art. 11 § 2 kk; Art. 11 § 3 kk; Art. 85 § 1 kk; Art. 86 § 1 kk; Art. 46 § 1 kk; Art. 63 § 1 kk; Art. 230 § 2 kpk; Art. 624 § 1 kpk; The court may acquit a defendant of one charge while convicting them of others based on the same facts if the evidence supports the latter but not the former, allowing for a combined sentence and restitution.