II K 32/18
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of insulting and threatening police officer during traffic stop, imposing combined fine.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of insulting and threatening a police officer during a traffic control operation, imposing a combined fine of 80 daily rates. The prosecution argued that the defendant used vulgar language and made credible threats while refusing to comply with police orders, supported by witness testimony and a body recorder. The court rejected the defendant's claims of innocence and the officer's improper conduct, finding the evidence sufficient to establish guilt for both offenses.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 226 § 1 kk; Art. 190 § 1 kk: A person who insults or threatens a police officer performing official duties shall be criminally liable, regardless of the officer's procedural errors.
Keywords
AI generated
insulting police officer
threatening official duties
traffic control stop
combined criminal penalty
police procedural error defense
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 226 § 1 kk
Art. 190 § 1 kk
Art. 85 § 1 kk
Art. 86 § 1 and § 2 kk
Art. 63 § 1 kk
Art. 627 kpk
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 755/16
Court convicts two individuals for assaulting and insulting police officers during lawful duties.
II K 752/13
Court convicted two individuals of insulting and assaulting police officers during a traffic stop, sentencing them to fines and suspended prison terms.
VIII K 639/16
Court convicted defendant of insulting police officers and sentenced to two months imprisonment without probation.
II K 67/15
Court imposed 6-month prison term and community service for public order disturbance involving police interaction.