Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IV U 417/17 AI generated

Court dismisses claim for refund of benefits due to lack of mandatory information on Article 17.

Case Number IV U 417/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the return of social benefits, ruling that the obligation to inform about Article 17 does not apply in this context. The plaintiff argued that without proper notification regarding the specific provisions of the Act on Financial Benefits, the benefits were improperly granted. The court held that the statutory requirement for such information is not triggered when the benefits are paid under the specific conditions of the Act on Financial Benefits in the event of illness and maternity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa; The obligation to inform the recipient about the content of Article 17 does not arise in cases where benefits are paid pursuant to the Act on Financial Benefits in the event of illness and maternity.

Keywords

AI generated
social benefits refund mandatory information obligation Article 17 Act illness and maternity procedural notification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
brak obowiązku zwrotu świadczenia przy braku pouczenia o treści art. 17 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

brak obowiązku zwrotu świadczenia przy braku pouczenia o treści art. 17 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa