Court dismisses claim for refund of benefits due to lack of mandatory information on Article 17.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the return of social benefits, ruling that the obligation to inform about Article 17 does not apply in this context. The plaintiff argued that without proper notification regarding the specific provisions of the Act on Financial Benefits, the benefits were improperly granted. The court held that the statutory requirement for such information is not triggered when the benefits are paid under the specific conditions of the Act on Financial Benefits in the event of illness and maternity.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa; The obligation to inform the recipient about the content of Article 17 does not arise in cases where benefits are paid pursuant to the Act on Financial Benefits in the event of illness and maternity.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
brak obowiązku zwrotu świadczenia przy braku pouczenia o treści art. 17 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa