IV K 395/17
AI generated
Court dismissed special recidivism charge due to prior sentence duration but allowed fine and time credit.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of possessing 4-MMC but dismissed the special recidivism charge because his prior sentences for similar crimes were only three months each, failing the six-month minimum requirement. While the prosecution argued for a heavier penalty based on recidivism, the court ruled that the specific statutory condition was not met. Consequently, the defendant was convicted of the possession offense, sentenced to a daily fine, and granted time credit for the period of detention.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii; Recydywa specjalna podstawowa wymaga, aby kara za przestępstwo poprzednie była orzeczona w wymiarze co najmniej sześciu miesięcy pozbawienia wolności.
Keywords
AI generated
possession of psychotropic substances
special basic recidivism
minimum six months sentence
daily fine penalty
time credit for detention
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 62 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
art. 64 § 1 k.k.
art. 37a k.k.
art. 53 k.k.
art. 63 § 1 k.k.
art. 70 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 63 § 1 k.k
art. 53 k.k