Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III Ca 468/17 AI generated

Court dismisses both appeals in a debt collection case regarding unpaid company fees. The judgment upholds the lower court's ruling on payment obligations. Both parties' appeals were rejected by the appellate civil court. The decision confirms the validity of the original monetary claim. Costs of the appeal proceedings were shared equally between the plaintiff and defendant. The court ruled that the debt remains enforceable despite the appeals. This case establishes the finality of the lower court's judgment on the debt. The legal issue centers on the dismissal of appeals in commercial debt disputes. The outcome affirms the creditor's right to collect the outstanding amount. The ruling serves as a precedent for similar debt collection cases in Poland.

Case Number III Ca 468/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed both the plaintiff's and defendant's appeals against the first-instance judgment ordering payment. The plaintiff, a company, sought enforcement of fees, while the defendant contested the amount and procedure. The court rejected the arguments that the debt was invalid or the procedure flawed, upholding the lower court's decision. Consequently, the original judgment remains in force, and the parties share the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 315 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.: The appellate court dismisses appeals when the first-instance judgment is legally sound and facts are correctly established, thereby maintaining the enforceability of the original monetary claim against the debtor.

Keywords

AI generated
appellate civil procedure dismissal of appeals debt collection enforcement costs sharing commercial liability claim judgment finality payment obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 315 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III Ca 468/17

WYROK W IMIENIU

RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 30 maja 2017 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi – III Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy W składzie następującym: Przewodniczący: Sędzia SO Katarzyna Kamińska – Krawczyk Sędziowie: SO Renata Jagura SR Bartosz Lewandowski Protokolant: Anna Paradowska po rozpoznaniu w dniu 17 maja 2017 roku w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa (...) -Serwis spółki z o.o. w O. przeciwko K. M. o zapłatę na skutek apelacji powoda i pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Rejonowego w Skierniewicach z dnia 13 grudnia 2016 roku sygn. akt I C 529/16 1. oddala obie apelacje;

2. znosi wzajemnie między stronami koszty postępowania apelacyjnego.