I C 1195/15 AI generated

Court dismissed plaintiff's claim regarding permanent usufruct fee increase and ordered defendant to pay procedural costs.

Case Number I C 1195/15

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2017-05-23

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit challenging the increase in the annual fee for permanent usufruct of the land. The defendant successfully demonstrated that the fee adjustment was based on a valid valuation report dated October 1, 2012, which legally preceded the termination notice. Consequently, the plaintiff lost the case and was ordered to reimburse the state for all procedural costs and expert fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o wieczystym użytkowaniu gruntów; Kodeks postępowania cywilnego: Wypowiedzenie użytkownika wieczystego musi być dokonane najdalej do 31 grudnia roku poprzedzającego rok aktualizacji opłaty, a nie w dniu aktualizacji; podwyższenie opłaty uzasadnione jest, gdy następuje ono na podstawie aktualnej wyceny dokonanej przed terminem wypowiedzenia.

Keywords

AI generated

permanent usufruct fee increase termination notice valuation report procedural costs civil procedure code land ownership

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 98 k.p.c.

art. 99 k.p.c.

§ 6 pkt 6 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.

art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych

art. 189 k.p.c

art. 321 § 1 k.p.c

art. 321 k.p.c

art. 98 k.p.c

art. 99 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal by remanding case to determine annual fee based on new valuation rules.

Appellate court awards insurance recovery and corrects procedural costs for mortgage loan default claim.

Appeal dismissed; plaintiff's claim for slip-and-fall damages rejected due to conflicting evidence proving fall occurred indoors.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; landowner failed to prove property value increase to justify higher perpetual use fee.

AI generated

Court upheld permanent easement fee based on expert opinion despite valuation errors and market trend disputes.

Court dismissed defendants' appeal and ordered payment of perpetual use fees and interest against S. S. and J. S.

Court dismissed land ownership fee dispute over valuation errors, ruling expert opinion sufficient without new expert.

Appeal dismissed; permanent easement fee update rejected due to defective written notice and procedural errors.

Full text