Appeal dismissed; court upheld traffic violation conviction based on reliable police testimony and expert opinion.

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a conviction for running a red light, upholding the first-instance judgment. The defendant argued that the court improperly excluded evidence and failed to conduct a necessary experiment to verify the traffic signal's status. The court rejected these claims, finding the first-instance judge correctly evaluated the consistent and logical testimony of two police officers and the expert's opinion, which together sufficiently established the facts of the incident.