Court acquits one defendant of theft with breaking and enters while convicting another of concealing stolen goods.

The court acquitted P. K. of theft with breaking and enters due to insufficient evidence of the break-in and lack of intent at the time of the crime. Conversely, P. C. was convicted of concealing stolen goods for accepting and storing the vehicle, though the court noted the act occurred after the theft was completed. The decision relied on Supreme Court precedent prohibiting the re-characterization of a completed theft as concealment when the facts do not match the specific elements of the new charge.