IX Ka 1096/13
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal on speeding charge, upholding first-instance conviction and costs due to procedural compliance.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a conviction for speeding, maintaining the original sentence and costs. The defendant argued that procedural errors in notifying them of the trial date violated their right to defense and necessitated a retrial. The court rejected these claims, finding the evidence reliable and the first-instance proceedings legally sound.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 437 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.s.w.: The appellate court may uphold a first-instance judgment if the procedural defects alleged by the appellant do not affect the outcome or the reliability of the evidence.
Keywords
AI generated
appeal on speeding
procedural notification error
right to defense violation
evidence reliability
appellate review standard
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.s.w.
Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.s.w.
Art. 3 ust. 1, Art. 8, Art. 21 pkt 2 of the Act on fines in criminal proceedings
§ 3 of the Ministry of Justice Regulation of 10. X. 2001
art. 71 § 2 k.p
art. 4 k.p
art. 8 k.p