Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III RC 271/16 AI generated

Family court dismisses alimentary claim due to lack of evidence regarding the child's actual residence and custody status.

Case Number III RC 271/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The family court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for alimony against the defendant. The plaintiff alleged a parent-child relationship and requested support, but failed to prove the child's current residence or the defendant's custody obligations. The court ruled that without concrete evidence establishing the factual basis for alimony, the claim could not be sustained.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o alimentach; Ustawa o opiece nad dzieckiem: The court dismisses an alimentary claim when the plaintiff fails to substantiate the child's residence or the obligor's custody duties.

Keywords

AI generated
alimentary claim family court dismissal custody status evidence child residence proof alimony obligation denial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 18 lipca 2005 r. o alimentach
Ustawa z dnia 13 czerwca 1967 r. - Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III RC 271/16 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 6 kwietnia 2017r. Sąd Rejonowy w Olsztynie III Wydział Rodzinny i Nieletnich w składzie: Przewodniczący: SSR Ada Wacław Protokolant: apl. adw. Dawid Rykaczewski po rozpoznaniu w dniu 6 kwietnia 2017r. w Olsztynie na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa J. Z. przeciwko K. Z. o alimenty powództwo oddala.