Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IV Ka 933/13 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against conviction for failing to identify vehicle driver, upholding intentional violation of road law reporting duty.

Case Number IV Ka 933/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal, upholding the lower court's conviction for failing to identify the vehicle driver as required by law. The defendant argued he could not recall who was driving due to a blurry photo and shared driving with his wife, but the court found these claims insufficient to justify non-compliance. The court ruled that the defendant's failure to provide a specific answer constituted an intentional violation of his statutory reporting obligation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 96 § 3 k.w.; Art. 78 ust. 4 i 5 PoRD; The court established that a vehicle owner's failure to identify the driver constitutes an intentional violation of the reporting duty, even if the owner claims inability to recall due to shared usage or photographic quality.

Keywords

AI generated
vehicle owner reporting duty intentional violation road law failure to identify driver criminal procedure appeal statutory reporting obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 96 § 3 k.w.
Art. 78 ust. 4 i 5 ustawy Prawo o Ruchu Drogowym
Art. 170 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 39 § 3 k.p.w.
Art. 424 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 82 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
§ 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 10 października 2001 r.
Art. 3 ust. 1, 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text