Court partially allowed appeal to correct execution title error and dismissed claim regarding interest calculation. The court ruled on procedural corrections and cost allocation. The judgment clarified that procedural errors in execution titles require correction while substantive claims are evaluated separately. The court applied civil procedure rules to determine cost liability between parties. The decision emphasizes the distinction between correcting clerical errors and adjudicating underlying debt disputes. This case establishes how execution titles are treated when challenged for accuracy. The ruling balances procedural integrity with the finality of execution proceedings.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court partially allowed the appeal by correcting obvious errors in the execution title regarding interest amounts and dates. The plaintiff sought to invalidate the entire execution title, while the defendant argued for dismissal of the claim. The court decided to correct the procedural errors in the title but dismissed the substantive claim for invalidation, ruling that the plaintiff's delay and conscious choice to litigate rather than settle justified full cost liability.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 479 k.p.c.; Art. 100 k.p.c.; Art. 108 k.p.c.; Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności radców prawnych; Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej; The court may correct obvious errors in execution titles but a party's decision to challenge such titles waives the right to claim exemption from litigation costs.