Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II W 599/16 AI generated

Court convicted driver of speeding violation and imposed fine despite defendant's procedural objections.

Case Number II W 599/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of speeding by 41 km/h and imposed a 300 zł fine, rejecting his claims regarding the radar measurement's accuracy and timing. The prosecution argued that the violation was confirmed by police radar and the defendant's refusal to accept a lower fine mandate. The court ruled that the offense is formal, requiring only proof of exceeding speed limits, and found the defendant's arguments insufficient to overturn the established facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 92a kw; Art. 20 PoRD; Art. 92a kw in conjunction with Art. 24 kw; Speeding offenses are formal violations where conviction requires only proof of exceeding limits, and procedural objections regarding measurement details do not invalidate the finding of guilt if the violation is objectively established.

Keywords

AI generated
speeding violation formal offense radar measurement traffic safety criminal fine procedural objection police evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 92a kw
Art. 20 PoRD
Art. 24 § 1 and 3 kw
Art. 33 kw
Art. 118 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 119 k.p.w.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text