Court upheld first-instance acquittal for parents abusing minor despite detailed reasoning flaws.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecutor's appeal, upholding the first-instance judgment that acquitted the parents of child abuse charges. Although the trial court provided an excessively detailed reasoning section, the appellate court found no substantive errors in the evidence or the acquittal itself. The decision emphasized that a formally perfect but substantively flawed reasoning section does not justify overturning a verdict based on the lack of criminal intent.