Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II C 588/16 AI generated

Civil court dismisses plaintiff's claim for payment against one defendant while allowing it against the other. The court rejects the appeal against the payment order issued to one defendant. The court upholds the initial payment order against one defendant but dismisses the plaintiff's claim against the other defendant. The court rejects the appeal against the payment order issued to one defendant. The court upholds the initial payment order against one defendant but dismisses the plaintiff's claim against the other defendant.

Case Number II C 588/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit against defendant K. K. (2) while allowing the claim against defendant K. K. (1). The plaintiff sought payment of 146,236.11 PLN based on a prior payment order issued against K. K. (2), which the court rejected. The court decided to uphold the original payment order against K. K. (1) but dismissed the suit against K. K. (2) due to the specific circumstances of that defendant's liability.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The court may partially allow an appeal by upholding the original judgment against one defendant while dismissing the claim against another defendant based on distinct liability findings.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal partial dismissal payment order multiple defendants liability distinction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt II C 588/16

WYROK W IMIENIU

RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 20 lutego 2017 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi, II Wydział Cywilny w składzie następującym: Przewodniczący: SSO Katarzyna Bielczyk Protokolant: st. sekr. sąd. Sylwia Nowakowska-Birke po rozpoznaniu w dniu 20 lutego 2017 roku w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa (...)Niestandaryzowanego Sekurytyzacyjnego Funduszu Inwestycyjnego Zamkniętego w W. przeciwko K. K. (1) i K. K. (2) o zapłatę kwoty 146.236,11 zł na skutek sprzeciwu pozwanego K. K. (2) od nakazu zapłaty z dnia 6 kwietnia 2016 roku, wydanego w postępowaniu upominawczym w sprawie sygn. akt II Nc 227/16 oddala powództwo wobec K. K. (2).