Court partially allowed appeal regarding sentence reduction and dismissed request for exemption from court costs.

The Court of Appeal partially upheld the appeal against the first-instance judgment, reducing the sentences for two defendants while dismissing the request to exempt them from court costs. The defendants argued for lighter penalties based on their recidivism status and lack of financial means, but the court found the original sentencing appropriate given the violence and prior convictions. Consequently, the appeal was granted only in part, while the exemption from costs was rejected due to the defendants' continued detention and the need to cover state expenses.