VI K 158/17
AI generated
Court convicts driver of driving without license after revocation and fines him.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of driving a vehicle while refusing to comply with a decision to revoke his driving license. The prosecution argued that the defendant knowingly drove despite having no license due to a prior refusal to undergo a mandatory psychological examination. The court found the facts established and imposed a fine based on the statutory provisions for this offense.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 180a k.k.; Art. 53 k.k.; Art. 115 § 2 k.k.: The court established that driving a vehicle without a valid license constitutes a criminal offense punishable by a fine when the driver knowingly disregards the revocation decision.
Keywords
AI generated
driving without license
criminal offense
revocation of license
psychological examination
criminal fine
intent direct
procedural costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 180a k.k.
Art. 53 k.k.
Art. 115 § 2 k.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 627 k.p.k
art. 280 § 2 k.k
art. 53 k.k
art. 115 § 2 k.k
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV KK 159/25
Supreme Court quashes lower court verdict for combining criminal penalties violating statutory limits and real concurrence rules.
II K 484/23
Court partially allowed offense under Art. 180a kk with suspended sentence and fine, rejecting vehicle ban.
VI Ka 227/22
Court quashes traffic offense verdict due to factual error regarding license revocation date affecting statute of limitations.
II K 136/16
Court convicted defendant of driving while banned, imposing six months prison for repeated violations.
II K 1229/17
Court convicted driver of driving without license after administrative license revocation, imposing two months imprisonment.