II K 464/16
AI generated
Joint theft and aiding in sale conviction upheld with specific sentences for each defendant.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted three defendants of joint theft and aiding in the sale of a stolen mobile phone. The prosecution successfully proved the facts, and the court found all three parties guilty of their respective charges. Consequently, specific prison sentences and confiscation orders were imposed on each defendant.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1, 3 k.k.; Art. 291 § 1 k.k.; Art. 64 § 1 k.k.; Art. 297 § 1 k.k.: The court established that joint offenders are liable for the entire crime committed in concert, while the accessory is punished proportionally to their role in the offense.
Keywords
AI generated
joint crime liability
theft of mobile phone
aiding in sale
accessory punishment
confiscation of gains
recidivism
proportionality of penalty
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1, 3 k.k.
Art. 291 § 1 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
Art. 297 § 1 k.k.
Art. 45 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1, 5 k.k.
Art. 618 § 1 pkt 11 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 633 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych