Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VIII U 2254/16 AI generated

Social security court dismisses appeal against pension reduction decision due to lack of new evidence.

Case Number VIII U 2254/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Social Security Court in Łódź dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the reduction of his pension amount. The appellant argued that the Social Security Office failed to properly assess his medical condition and work history, while the Office maintained the reduction was justified based on existing records. The court ruled that without new evidence or a change in circumstances, the original decision regarding the pension calculation stands valid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.: An appeal against a social security decision is dismissed if the appellant fails to provide new evidence or demonstrate a change in circumstances justifying a different outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
social security appeal pension reduction lack of new evidence social security office administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt VIII U 2254/16

WYROK W IMIENIU

RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 13 marca 2017 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi VIII Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w składzie: Przewodniczący SSO Agnieszka Olejniczak-Kosiara Protokolant st. sekr. I. G. po rozpoznaniu w dniu 27 lutego 2017 roku w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy z wniosku J. P. przeciwko Zakładowi Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w T. o wysokość emerytury na skutek odwołania J. P. od decyzji Zakładu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w T. z dnia 7 września 2016 roku, znak (...) oddala odwołanie