Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 30/17 AI generated

Court dismissed tax fraud appeal, ruling the fine was not grossly disproportionate to the defendant's income and the crime's severity.

Case Number II Ka 30/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court upheld the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of tax fraud and imposed a fine of 80 daily rates. The prosecution argued the defendant concealed income and inflated losses in tax filings, while the defense appealed claiming the penalty was excessively harsh. The court rejected the appeal, finding the fine proportionate to the defendant's high income and the social harm caused by the two fraudulent acts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 56 § 2 k.k.s. w zw. z art. 56 § 1 k.k.s. w zw. z art. 9 § 3 k.k.s.; Art. 23 § 3 k.k.s.; Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 113 § 1 k.k.s.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal against a tax fraud conviction and fine is dismissed if the penalty is not grossly disproportionate to the circumstances, the defendant's income, and the social harm caused.

Keywords

AI generated
tax fraud grossly disproportionate fine proportionality tax evasion appellate review criminal penalty CIT-8 declaration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 56 § 2 k.k.s. w zw. z art. 56 § 1 k.k.s. w zw. z art. 9 § 3 k.k.s.
Art. 23 § 3 k.k.s.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 113 § 1 k.k.s.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art.56 § 2 k.k
art.56 § 1 k.k
art. 9 § 3 k.k
art. 85 k.k
art. 113 § 1 k.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
OSNPG 1974 / 3-4 / 51
OSNPK 1995/6/18

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text