Court dismisses appeal regarding fine calculation and costs, ruling on specific criminal act rather than general conduct.

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal, confirming the first-instance judgment which convicted her for a specific act of insult rather than her general conduct during the relationship. The court clarified that income and assets are not relevant criteria for sentencing severity and applied the older version of the Criminal Code because the legislative change was not retroactively beneficial. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to pay court fees and the private prosecutor's costs based on the procedural rules applicable at the time of the proceedings.