II K 1097/16
AI generated
Court sentenced defendant to six months imprisonment suspended for one year for theft with confession.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of theft and sentenced him to six months of imprisonment suspended for one year. The prosecution argued for a custodial sentence, while the defense likely emphasized the minor nature of the act and the defendant's confession. The court balanced the social harm of the theft against the defendant's confession, lack of prior prison time, and current employment status to justify the suspended sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.; Art. 69 § 1 k.k.: The court established that a suspended sentence is appropriate for theft when the offender confesses, has not previously served prison time, and demonstrates a lack of moral degradation, thereby achieving the preventive goals of punishment.
Keywords
AI generated
theft of bicycle
suspended sentence
confession of guilt
social harm assessment
probation period
criminal liability
minor offender
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.
Art. 33 § 1, 2 and 3 kk
Art. 69 § 1 and 2 k.k.
Art. 70 § 1 k.k.
Art. 72 § 1 pkt 2 k.k.
Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 278 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedV KK 279/04