Court acquits defendant of intentional damage to neighbor's garden due to insufficient evidence and conflicting witness testimony.

The court acquitted the defendant, K.S., of intentional damage to a neighbor's vegetable garden based on a lack of corroborating evidence. While the victim claimed the defendant sprayed chemicals causing crop loss, the defendant denied entering the neighbor's land and explained the damage was due to natural growth. The court found the victim's delayed reporting and the absence of chemical traces at the scene undermined the credibility of the victim's and witness statements.