Court grants suspended sentence for minor assault in property dispute and orders compensation.

The court convicted the defendant of intentional injury and imposed a suspended sentence of one year, finding his guilt and social danger were not significant. The defendant argued for leniency based on his lack of prior record and the emotional context of a long-standing property dispute with the victim. The court accepted these factors, ruling that the victim provoked the confrontation by unilaterally altering the shared garden, thus justifying the suspended sentence and the ordered compensation.