Legislator Case Law & Legislation
X P 662/15 AI generated

Court dismissed termination pay claim where dismissal was based on both term expiry and employee's unsuitability.

Case Number X P 662/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The plaintiff sought termination pay for dismissal due to reasons unrelated to the employee, citing the expiration of the mayor's term. The defendant argued that the mayor retained the power to dismiss the deputy at any time, regardless of the term change. The court found that the dismissal was justified by the plaintiff's unsuitability for the role, meaning the term expiry was not the sole cause. Consequently, the claim for termination pay was rejected, and the plaintiff bore the procedural costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników; Art. 26a ust. 1 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym: Termination pay is due only if the cause unrelated to the employee is the exclusive basis for dismissal; if other valid reasons exist, such as the employee's unsuitability, the right to termination pay is excluded.

Keywords

AI generated
termination pay dismissal reasons exclusive basis municipal employment term expiry employee unsuitability procedural costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników
Art. 26a ust. 1 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym
Art. 98 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 97 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 98 § 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II PK 30/09

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text