IV Ka 817/13
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for careless driving and rejected cost waiver due to defendant's income.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appeal against a conviction for careless driving under Article 86 of the Code on Administrative Offenses. The defendant argued that the court erred in fact-finding regarding the accident and improperly applied procedural rules concerning evidence and cost waivers. The court rejected these claims, noting sufficient documentary evidence and the defendant's declared income of 2,000 zloty, which precluded a waiver of court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 86 § 1 k.w.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.: The court of appeal may uphold a first-instance judgment for careless driving if the evidence is sufficient, and it may deny a waiver of court costs when the defendant has a stable income and is not the sole family provider.
Keywords
AI generated
careless driving conviction
appellate court dismissal
court costs waiver
administrative offense code
procedural law violation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 86 § 1 k.w.
Art. 7 k.p.k.
Art. 4 k.p.k.
Art. 5 k.p.k.
Art. 8 k.p.w.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 119 k.p.ow.
Art. 636 § 1 k.w.
Art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z Art. 21 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedSA w Krakowie II AKr 110/93
SA w Krakowie II AKr 24/93
SA w Krakowie II AKr 269/92
V KK 332/03
II KK 31/03