Court dismisses conviction due to factual errors and remands case for new evidence gathering.

The appellate court overturned the first-instance conviction, finding the lower court's factual findings arbitrary and based on incomplete evidence. The defendant argued the bus stop was not blocked, while the prosecution claimed it was, but the trial court failed to verify these conflicting accounts. Consequently, the court remanded the case for a retrial with new measurements and witness testimonies to objectively determine if the obstruction exceeded normal traffic conditions.