IX Ka 1267/13
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against speeding fine, upholding evidence and penalty for traffic violation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a traffic fine for speeding, ruling that the lower court correctly evaluated the evidence. The defense argued factual errors regarding the speed measurement device, but the court found witness testimony and verified calibration certificates conclusive. Consequently, the original conviction and 500 zł fine were upheld as legally sound.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.; Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 7 k.p.k.: The court of appeal must uphold a first-instance judgment on a traffic offense if the lower court properly assessed evidence and facts, rejecting arguments that the speed measurement device was invalid or that the defendant's denial was credible.
Keywords
AI generated
traffic violation appeal
speeding fine enforcement
evidence assessment standard
speed measurement device
calibration certificate validity
witness testimony credibility
appellate review scope
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.
Art. 92akw
Art. 7 k.p.k.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 10.10.2001r.