Appeal dismissed; court upheld acquittal due to lack of evidence proving damage to crops or grass.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the victim's appeal, upholding the lower court's acquittal of the defendant for the alleged offense of damaging crops. The defendant had admitted to driving a tractor on the victim's land but denied causing specific damage, while the victim failed to prove the existence of the damaged plants or the extent of the grass destruction. The appellate court found the evidence insufficient to establish the material elements of the crime, as the victim could not specify the planting dates or quantity of saplings, and no inspection confirmed the damage occurred.