Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III Ca 1724/15 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against investment fund judgment due to lack of new evidence and procedural compliance.

Case Number III Ca 1724/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Łódź dismissed the appellant's appeal against the lower court's judgment ordering payment from a closed investment fund. The appellant argued for additional compensation based on alleged market losses, but the court found no new evidence to alter the original assessment. Consequently, the decision to reject the appeal was upheld as the procedural requirements for a successful revision were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: An appeal is rejected when the appellate court finds that the lower court's decision was based on correct facts and law, and the appellant has failed to present new evidence or arguments that could change the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal procedure investment fund liability lack of new evidence dismissal of appeal closed investment fund

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III Ca 1724/15

WYROK W IMIENIU

RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 10 grudnia 2015 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi, III Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy w składzie: Przewodniczący : SSO Bogdan Jachowicz po rozpoznaniu w dniu 10 grudnia 2015 roku w Łodzi na posiedzeniu niejawnym sprawy z powództwa (...) Niestandaryzowanego Sekurytyzacyjnego Funduszu Inwestycyjnego Zamkniętego z siedzibą w W. przeciwko B. B. o zapłatę na skutek apelacji pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Rejonowego w Zgierzu z dnia 12 sierpnia 2015 roku sygn. akt I C 856/15 oddala apelację.