XI W 12894/15
AI generated
Court convicts owner for failing to identify driver, ruling statutory duty exists despite Constitutional Court interpretation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the vehicle owner of a traffic violation for failing to identify the driver when summoned. The defendant argued that the Constitutional Court's ruling invalidated the obligation to name a driver, but the court rejected this. The court held that the statutory duty remains valid and the owner acted intentionally by refusing to comply.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 kw; Art. 92 § 1 kw: The owner of a vehicle remains legally obligated to identify the driver upon request, and this obligation cannot be superseded by judicial interpretations regarding the scope of the Constitutional Court's rulings.
Keywords
AI generated
traffic violation
vehicle owner liability
driver identification
Constitutional Court interpretation
intentional offense
fine imposition
procedural duty
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 96 § 3 kw
art. 92 § 1 kw
art. 118 § 1 k.p.w.
art. 119 k.p.w.
art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 33 k.w.
art. 24 § 1 i 3 kw
art. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 42 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 118 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedP 7/13 (OTK-A 2014/3/30)