Court acquits two men of property damage due to insufficient evidence and reasonable doubt under Polish law.

The court acquitted two defendants of property damage charges based on a total lack of conclusive evidence regarding their specific roles in the incident. While witnesses placed the defendants at the scene, the sole witness identifying them became unreliable due to intoxication and memory loss, rendering his testimony inconsistent and insufficient. The court applied the principle of in dubio pro reo, ruling that the remaining doubts must be resolved in favor of the accused, leading to their acquittal.