Alimony claim dismissed as divorce decree already settled support and parties share living costs equally.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for additional alimony, ruling that the divorce decree from April 2014 already addressed support obligations. The plaintiff argued her health costs had worsened due to the defendant's prior misconduct, but the court found no significant material deterioration in her financial situation compared to the joint household income. Consequently, the court held that awarding further alimony would violate the principle of solidarity between divorced spouses who continue to share living expenses.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 60 § 2 k.r.o.; Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.: Divorce does not automatically entitle the innocent spouse to alimony if their financial situation has not significantly worsened compared to the joint household, especially when living costs are shared.