Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VIII P 1451/13 AI generated

Court dismisses plaintiff's claim to restore employment but awards costs to the employer.

Case Number VIII P 1451/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to reinstate the employee to their position while ordering the plaintiff to pay the employer's legal costs. The plaintiff argued for reinstatement based on a prior employment relationship, but the court found no legal basis to compel the employer to resume the specific job. Consequently, the claim for reinstatement was rejected, yet the procedural burden of costs was shifted to the unsuccessful party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 101 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 102 k.p.c.: The court may dismiss a claim for reinstatement if the legal prerequisites are not met, while simultaneously awarding litigation costs to the opposing party.

Keywords

AI generated
reinstatement claim labor law dispute litigation costs dismissal of action employer liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 101 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 4 listopada 2015r. Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy Śródmieścia Wydział VIII Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w składzie: Przewodniczący SSR Rafał Młyński Ławnicy: Renata Zych, Małgorzata Sitkiewicz Protokolant: Michał Machura po rozpoznaniu na rozprawie w dniu 21 października 2015r. w Warszawie sprawy z powództwa M. P. przeciwko Instytutowi (...) z siedzibą w K. o przywrócenie do pracy I. oddala powództwo; II. zasądza od M. P.na rzecz Instytutu (...) z siedzibą w K.koszty procesu w kwocie 60 zł (sześćdziesiąt).