II W 2538/15
AI generated
Court acquits vehicle owner for failure to name driver when radar photo cannot identify the actual driver.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court acquitted the vehicle owner, A. M., of the offense of failing to identify the driver of his car. Although a speed camera recorded a violation by the vehicle, the owner claimed he or his son was driving but could not specify which one at the time of the incident. The court ruled that since the radar photograph failed to identify the driver, the owner could not be held liable for the failure to name a driver.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 kw; Art. 78 ust. 4 Prawo o ruchu drogowym: A vehicle owner is not liable for the offense of failing to identify the driver if the available evidence, such as a speed camera photograph, does not allow for the identification of the actual driver.
Keywords
AI generated
failure to identify driver
vehicle owner liability
speed camera evidence
traffic violation acquittal
identification impossibility
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 96 § 3 kw
Art. 78 ust. 4 Ustawy Prawo o ruchu drogowym
Art. 2 kw
Art. 118 § 2 kpsw
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok TK z dnia 30 września 2015 r., sygn. K 3/13
wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 12 marca 2014 r., sygn. akt P 27/13