XVIII C 329/15
AI generated
Civil court dismisses claim for return of seized documents citing statute of limitations and lack of unlawful act.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe plaintiff sought 100,000 PLN for the return of specific bills of exchange allegedly wrongfully seized during criminal proceedings. The defendant argued the claim was time-barred and that the seized documents were not part of the evidentiary material used in the lower court's decision. The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff failed to prove the specific bills were unlawfully detained or lost, and the statute of limitations had expired.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 417 § 2 k.c.; Art. 98 k.p.c.; The court cannot review the legality of criminal court rulings in civil proceedings, and a claim for damages requires proof of an unlawful act causing specific damage, which is also subject to limitation periods.
Keywords
AI generated
statute of limitations
civil liability
unlawful detention
criminal proceedings
evidence seizure
damages claim
public authority
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 417 § 2 k.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
Art. 11 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 8 lipca 2005 r. o Prokuratorii Generalnej Skarbu Państwa
§ 6 pkt 6 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 284§2 k.k
art. 98 k.p.c
art. 231§1 k.p.k
art. 228§1 k.p.k
art. 244 § 1 k.p.c
art. 245 k.p.c