IX Ka 912/13
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against conviction for attempted damage to fence, upholding evidence of intent to destroy property.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal, upholding the first-instance conviction for attempted damage to a fence. The defendant argued that the court relied on presumptions rather than facts, claiming he intended to restore his land rather than destroy the fence. The court rejected this, citing witness testimony and video footage proving the defendant deliberately tried to break the fence posts.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 124 § 1 k.w.; Art. 2 § 2 k.p.k.: The court may convict based on presumptions of intent when direct evidence is lacking, provided the presumption is logically derived from established facts and the defendant fails to prove a lawful justification like self-help.
Keywords
AI generated
attempted damage
criminal appeal
presumption of intent
self-help defense
property boundary dispute
video evidence
court costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 124 § 1 k.w.
Art. 11 § 1 k.w.
Art. 124 § 2 k.w.
Art. 11 § 3 k.w.
Art. 24 § 1 k.w.
Art. 24 § 3 k.w.
Art. 2 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 343 § 2 k.c.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.
Art. 456 k.p.k.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 3 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 10 października 2001 roku