XI W 1544/15
AI generated
Court convicts driver for intentional traffic violation and orders fine plus procedural costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of a traffic violation for intentionally driving against a 'no traffic in both directions' sign. Although the defendant argued for leniency due to traffic congestion, the court determined the act was socially harmful and committed with direct intent. Consequently, the court imposed a 350 zloty fine and ordered the defendant to pay procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92 § 1 kw; Art. 33 kw: A driver who intentionally violates a traffic prohibition sign, despite knowing alternative routes exist, commits a socially harmful offense warranting criminal liability and a fine.
Keywords
AI generated
intentional traffic violation
no traffic sign
social harm assessment
direct intent
procedural costs
traffic congestion defense
criminal liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92 § 1 kw
Art. 33 kw
Art. 118 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych