Legislator Case Law & Legislation
XI W 296/15 AI generated

Court convicted defendant for one night of noise disturbance but acquitted her for three other incidents due to insufficient evidence.

Case Number XI W 296/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of disturbing the peace on July 4-5, 2014, but acquitted her regarding three other alleged incidents. The prosecution argued the defendant was responsible for loud music in a club, while the defense claimed insufficient evidence linked her to specific nights. The court ruled that for three charges, the victim could not identify the noise source or prove the defendant's liability, necessitating acquittal under the principle of benefit of the doubt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 51 § 1 kw; Art. 62 § 3 kpw; Art. 5 § 1 pkt 1 kpw: Where evidence is insufficient to establish the accused's responsibility for disturbing the peace, the court must acquit the accused on those specific charges while potentially convicting on other proven offenses.

Keywords

AI generated
disturbing peace noise pollution insufficient evidence benefit of doubt partial acquittal nighttime disturbance club liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 51 § 1 kw
Art. 24 § 1 kw
§ 3 kw
Art. 5 § 1 pkt 1 kpw
Art. 62 § 3 kpw
Art. 33 kw
Art. 118 § 1 kpw
Art. 627 kpk
Art. 630 kpk
Art. 119 kpw
Art. 3 ust. 1 Ustawy z dn. 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text