III RC 242/15
AI generated
Alimony obligation terminated by remarriage; defendant exempted from court costs due to social reasons.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court established that the alimentary obligation terminated on April 11, 2015, due to the defendant's remarriage. While the plaintiff's claim for termination was granted, the court found no basis to order the defendant to pay court costs. The judge exempted the defendant from costs citing her social situation, including unemployment, child-rearing, and support for a new husband.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 60 § 3 k.r.o.; Art. 102 k.p.c.: The alimentary obligation to a divorced spouse ceases upon their remarriage; however, the court may exempt the losing party from court costs if special social circumstances justify it.
Keywords
AI generated
termination of alimony
remarriage effect
court costs exemption
social reasons
divorce law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 60 § 3 k.r.o.
Art. 27 k.r.o.
Art. 138 k.r.o.
Art. 102 k.p.c.