IV Ka 644/13 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld traffic fine as procedural errors did not affect verdict outcome.

Case Number IV Ka 644/13

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2013-09-05

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against a traffic fine for failing to designate a vehicle driver. The defendant argued procedural flaws, including the lack of a formal complaint and errors in the prosecution's request, but the court found these arguments baseless. The court ruled that the identified errors, such as a clerical mistake regarding the date of evidence collection, did not influence the final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.; Art. 57 § 3 k.p.w.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 3 ust. 1, 8; Art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych: A procedural error or clerical mistake by the court does not warrant the setting aside or modification of a judgment if it did not have an impact on the substance of the decision.

Keywords

AI generated

appeal against traffic fine procedural error impact clerical mistake in judgment failure to designate driver costs of appeal proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.

Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.

Art. 57 § 3 k.p.w.

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 3 ust. 1, 8

Art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 10 października 2001 r.

art. 424 k.p.k

art. 82 § 1 k.p

art. 7 k.p.k

Appeal dismissed; court upheld traffic fine as procedural errors did not affect verdict outcome.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text