IV Ka 651/15
AI generated
Appeal court quarts sentence for drunk driving due to insufficient evidence of blood alcohol level.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appeal court quashed the first-instance judgment and remanded the case for retrial. The prosecution appealed because the lower court failed to establish the defendant's blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit. The court found the evidence insufficient to prove the statutory elements of the offense and therefore could not uphold the conviction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa Prawo o Ruchu Drogowym art. 82a; Ustawa Kodeks postępowania karnego art. 437 § 2: A conviction for driving under the influence requires conclusive proof of exceeding the legal blood alcohol limit; absence of such evidence mandates quashing the verdict and remanding the case.
Keywords
AI generated
drunk driving
blood alcohol limit
insufficient evidence
quashing verdict
remand for retrial
Cited Legislation
AI generatedUstawa Prawo o Ruchu Drogowym z dnia 20.06.1997r. art. 82a
Ustawa Kodeks postępowania karnego art. 437 § 2
Ustawa Kodeks postępowania karnego art. 438 pkt 2
Ustawa Kodeks postępowania karnego art. 109 § 2